| Seduced by Specifications |
| Written by Administrator | |
| Monday, 17 March 2008 | |
|
People rate everything on its details, from digital cameras and computers to new cars and stereo systems. It goes like this: You look at the specification sheet, compare it to that of other products, and buy the best one. Sounds simple enough, right? Using the "more is better" theory, you could easily imagine that the digital camera with the most pixels, the fastest recycle time, the biggest memory card, or the most features must be the best. While this sounds logical enough, allow me to paraphrase Mark Twain: There are liars, damned liars, and statistics. In other words, don't judge a digital camera solely by its numbers. Rather, look for the small details that really indicate how well a product is designed. Digital DejaVu The Art of Nitpicking Another detail is the optical viewfinder. As one of many millions of Americans on the downhill side of 40, my eyes aren't what they used to be. Consequently, I tend to have a better opinion of any digital camera that has an optical viewfinder with a focusable diopter so that I can clearly see the subject. The same is true with frame markers, those tiny lines in the optical viewfinder that show exactly what you're capturing. To save money, some manufacturers don't put frame markers on the viewfinder, and you're left guessing what part of the picture will be cut out. Even in many of the cameras with them, the frame markers are dark stripes, which are impossible to see in low light, instead of the more expensive, easier-to-see, frosted-glass, etched lines. LCD viewfinders are wonderful for previews and playbacks--as long as you aren't shooting outdoors. Good cameras have solutions such as a high/low switch to change the LCD viewfinder's brightness, a pivoting LCD viewfinder, or a rotating camera body. Personally, I prefer digital cameras with a knob or button that changes LCD brightness at a touch rather than having to do it through menu commands. Another tiny yet telling detail is the way a digital camera feels when you hold it. Is the camera shaped to fit your palm, or is there a grip or indentation provided on which your fingers can rest, and is this covered with a nonslip material or just with ornamental, dark-plastic trim? Is the Capture button placed so that your index finger automatically rests on top of it? Can you hold the camera firmly yet naturally for several minutes without becoming fatigued? It's best to use a digital camera that gives you a sure and safe grip and that neither cramps your hand nor crowds your fingers. Here are a few other details to look for which, all other things being equal, can be helpful in narrowing down your choice of a digital camera:
|
|
| Last Updated ( Monday, 17 March 2008 ) |